1. 程式人生 > >使用hint優化Oracle的執行計劃 以及 SQL Tune Advisor的使用

使用hint優化Oracle的執行計劃 以及 SQL Tune Advisor的使用

背景:

某表忽然出現查詢非常緩慢的情況,cost 100+ 秒以上;嚴重影響生產。

原SQL:

explain plan for 
select * from (
select ID id,RET_NO retNo, FROM_SYS fromSy, TO_SYS toSys, COMMAND_CODE commandCode, COMMAND, STATUS, 
EXT_CODE, ORIGN_CODE orignCode,error_message errorMessage, RE_F, RET_MSG retMsg 
from interface_table where ((command_code in('AASSS') 
			and  status in('F','E') and (re_f = 'N') and FROM_SYS = 'MEE')
			or (COMMAND_CODE in('XXXX','XXXX9') and FROM_SYS = 'EXT' and RE_F = 'N')
			) and MOD(id, 1) = 0  order by id) where rownum <= 100  ;
檢視其執行計劃:
SELECT plan_table_output FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY('PLAN_TABLE'));
Plan hash value: 1871549687
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                     | Name               | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                    |    99 |   382K|   637   (1)| 00:00:08 |
|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY                |                    |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   VIEW                        |                    |   100 |   386K|   637   (1)| 00:00:08 |
|*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| INTERFACE_TABLE    |   355 | 55735 |   637   (1)| 00:00:08 |
|*  4 |     INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_INTERFACE_TABLE |  1439 |       |   280   (2)| 00:00:04 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

優化後的SQL:

explain plan for 
select * from (
select /*+ index(INT_TABLE IX_INT_TABLE_2)*/ ID id,RET_NO retNo, FROM_SYS fromSy, TO_SYS toSys, COMMAND_CODE commandCode, COMMAND, STATUS, 
EXT_CODE, ORIGN_CODE orignCode,error_message errorMessage, RE_F, RET_MSG retMsg 
from interface_table where ((command_code in('AASSS') 
			and  status in('F','E') and (re_f = 'N') and FROM_SYS = 'MEE')
			or (COMMAND_CODE in('XXXX','XXXX9') and FROM_SYS = 'EXT' and RE_F = 'N')
			) and MOD(id, 1) = 0 order by id) where rownum <= 100  ;
檢視其執行計劃:
SELECT plan_table_output FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY('PLAN_TABLE'));
Plan hash value: 3625182869
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                       | Name                 | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                      |    99 |   382K| 19105   (1)| 00:03:50 |
|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY                  |                      |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   VIEW                          |                      |   356 |  1376K| 19105   (1)| 00:03:50 |
|*  3 |    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY        |                      |   356 | 55892 | 19105   (1)| 00:03:50 |
|   4 |     CONCATENATION               |                      |       |       |            |          |
|*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| INTERFACE_TABLE      |    69 | 10833 |  9552   (1)| 00:01:55 |
|*  6 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IX_INTERFACE_TABLE_2 | 77145 |       |    99   (0)| 00:00:02 |
|*  7 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| INTERFACE_TABLE      |   287 | 45059 |  9552   (1)| 00:01:55 |
|*  8 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IX_INTERFACE_TABLE_2 | 77145 |       |    99   (0)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


比較:

檢視執行計劃,原來是使用 full scan - 當資料量大時非常慢;優化後oracle優先走range scan,hint 的 index 是未處理標識欄位的索引,正常情況下這個資料集合相對較小--------所以可以達到優化目的。

具體情況具體分析,我們必須要看實際的表存的業務資料,分析其業務關係找到最小業務集合;後者要看懂執行計劃,根據rows, bytes, cost, time 找到最優專案。這個分析順序不能倒置。

問題:為何使用 rownum 後,oracle執行計劃會走full scan?

轉:如何看懂執行計劃:http://jadethao.iteye.com/blog/1613943

====  section2 ====

http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-77311-id-3233190.html

環境: OS:Red Hat Linux As 5 DB:10.2.0.4 Oracle通過STA給出某個SQL執行建議,下面通過一個測試檢查Oracle給出的優化建議是否正確. 1.建表並生成測試資料 SQL> create table tb_test(id number not null,name varchar2(30)); Table created. SQL> create index idx_tb_test on tb_test(id); Index created. SQL> declare
begin
  for i in 1 .. 100000 loop
    insert into tb_test values (i, 'test');
    commit;
  end loop;
end;
/
2.分析表 begin
  dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname => 'SCOTT', tabname => 'TB_TEST');
end;

3.編造一個執行計劃不對的SQL

select/*+ full(t)*/ count(1) from scott.tb_test t where t.id=1

我們知道在ID列上有索引,這個SQL走索引是正確的執行計劃,但這裡強制oracle走全表掃描,然後通過STA,看oracle給出的執行計劃是否正確.

4.建立TUNING_TASK並執行

declare
  l_task_name varchar2(30);
  l_sql       clob;
begin
  l_sql       := 'select/*+ full(t)*/ count(1) from scott.tb_test t where t.id=1';
  l_task_name := DBMS_SQLTUNE.CREATE_TUNING_TASK(sql_text    => l_sql,
                                                 user_name   => 'SCOTT',
                                                 scope       => 'COMPREHENSIVE',
                                                 time_limit  => 60,
                                                 task_name   => 'task_name01',
                                                 description => null);
dbms_sqltune.Execute_tuning_task(task_name => 'task_name01');
end;

5.檢視oracle給出的優化建議

SQL> set serveroutput on;
SQL> set long 999999999;
SQL> SELECT DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('task_name01') FROM DUAL;

DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuning Task Name                  : task_name01
Tuning Task Owner                 : SYS
Scope                             : COMPREHENSIVE
Time Limit(seconds)               : 60
Completion Status                 : COMPLETED
Started at                        : 06/03/2012 00:07:58
Completed at                      : 06/03/2012 00:07:59
Number of SQL Profile Findings    : 1


DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('MY_TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schema Name: SCOTT
SQL ID     : ga3q5tqjgsj5u
SQL Text   : select/*+ full(t)*/ count(1) from scott.tb_test t where t.id=1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDINGS SECTION (1 finding)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1- SQL Profile Finding (see explain plans section below)
--------------------------------------------------------

DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('MY_TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  A potentially better execution plan was found for this statement.

  Recommendation (estimated benefit: 84.11%)
  ------------------------------------------
  - Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile.
    execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'task_name01',
            replace => TRUE);

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPLAIN PLANS SECTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1- Original With Adjusted Cost
------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1372292586

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation          | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 當前的執行計劃
DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |           |     1 |     4 |     6   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |           |     1 |     4 |            |          |

|*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| TB_TEST   |     1 |     4 |     6   (0)| 00:00:01 |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   2 - filter("T"."ID"=1)

-- Oracle給出的執行計劃

2- Using SQL Profile
--------------------
Plan hash value: 847665939

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| Id  | Operation         | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
  |

DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |               |     1 |     4 |     1   (0)| 00:00:0
1 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE   |               |     1 |     4 |            |
  |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TB_TEST   |     1 |     4 |     1   (0)| 00:00:0
1 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TASK_NAME01')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   2 - access("T"."ID"=1)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

從上面的輸出可以看出Oracle給出的執行計劃是正確的.可以使用如下方法使用正確的執行計劃

begin
  dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'task_name01', replace => TRUE);
end;

-- The End --