方法1

s1=''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits) for _ in range(10**7))

方法2

for _ in range(10**7):
    s2 += random.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits)

方法3

s3=''.join(random.choices(string.ascii_letters + string.digits, k=10**7))

執行時間對比

import time, random,
 
 string

time_s_1 = time.time()
s1=''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits) for _ in range(10**7))
time_e_1 = time.time()
print('method 1:', str(time_e_1 - time_s_1))

s2=''
time_s_2 = time.time()
for _ in range(10**7):
    s2 += random.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits)
time_e_2 =
 
 time.time()
print('method 2:', str(time_e_2 - time_s_2))

time_s_3 = time.time()
s3=''.join(random.choices(string.ascii_letters + string.digits, k=10**7))
time_e_3 = time.time()
print('method 3:', str(time_e_3 - time_s_3))

下面是輸出的執行時間：

method 1: 9.464683055877686
method 2: 18.667069911956787
method 3: 2.693830728530884
 

結論：系統內建函式random.choices速度最快