Mina中關於多個同類型Filter(如ProtocolCodecFilter)例項共存問題的解決
阿新 • • 發佈:2019-01-07
最近在研讀Mina框架的原始碼,剛好手頭上有專案就直接用上了。直接進入正題……
對Mina有點了解的人都知道,Mina中有一條FilterChain,我們可以向其中加入Filter實現鏈式處理。從原始碼看來,多數Filter(如ProtocolCodecFilter)在使用過程只允許有一個例項。若FilterChain中存在多個相同的例項,則有可能出現各種莫明其妙的問題,這些問題往往是超出你預料之外的,而且除錯起來比較困難,除非你熟知Mina整個框架。究其原因,主要是在AttributeKey的問題,例:
public class ProtocolCodecFilter extends IoFilterAdapter { /** A logger for this class */ private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ProtocolCodecFilter.class); private static final Class<?>[] EMPTY_PARAMS = new Class[0]; private static final IoBuffer EMPTY_BUFFER = IoBuffer.wrap(new byte[0]); private final AttributeKey ENCODER = new AttributeKey(ProtocolCodecFilter.class, "encoder"); private final AttributeKey DECODER = new AttributeKey(ProtocolCodecFilter.class, "decoder"); private final AttributeKey DECODER_OUT = new AttributeKey(ProtocolCodecFilter.class, "decoderOut"); private final AttributeKey ENCODER_OUT = new AttributeKey(ProtocolCodecFilter.class, "encoderOut"); ... private ProtocolDecoderOutput getDecoderOut(IoSession session, NextFilter nextFilter) { ProtocolDecoderOutput out = (ProtocolDecoderOutput) session.getAttribute(DECODER_OUT); if (out == null) { // Create a new instance, and stores it into the session out = new ProtocolDecoderOutputImpl(); session.setAttribute(DECODER_OUT, out); } return out; } ... }
假設有兩個ProtocolCodecFilter例項,那麼同一時刻它們在各自的例項中AttributeKey其實是一樣的,即如果通過
ProtocolDecoderOutput out = (ProtocolDecoderOutput) session.getAttribute(DECODER_OUT);
它們獲取的例項是一樣的。因此,也就造成兩個例項中的ProtocolCodecOutput產生相互干擾的情況。
我們再來看看為什麼兩個例項中的AttributeKey為什麼會是一樣的。
session.getAttrubute(...) 中儲存<KEY, VALUE>對的其實是package org.apache.mina.core.session; import java.io.Serializable; /** * Creates a Key from a class name and an attribute name. The resulting Key will * be stored in the session Map.<br> * For instance, we can create a 'processor' AttributeKey this way : * * <pre> * private static final AttributeKey PROCESSOR = new AttributeKey( * SimpleIoProcessorPool.class, "processor"); * </pre> * * This will create the <b>
[email protected]</b> key * which will be stored in the session map.<br> * Such an attributeKey is mainly useful for debug purposes. * * @author <a href="http://mina.apache.org">Apache MINA Project</a> */ public final class AttributeKey implements Serializable { /** The serial version UID */ private static final long serialVersionUID = -583377473376683096L; /** The attribute's name */ private final String name; public AttributeKey(Class<?> source, String name) { this.name = source.getName() + '.' + name + '@' + Integer.toHexString(this.hashCode()); } @Override public String toString() { return name; } @Override public int hashCode() { int h = 17 * 37 + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode()); return h; } @Override public boolean equals(Object obj) { if (this == obj) { return true; } if (!(obj instanceof AttributeKey)) { return false; } AttributeKey other = (AttributeKey) obj; return name.equals(other.name); } }
private static class DefaultIoSessionAttributeMap implements IoSessionAttributeMap {
private final ConcurrentHashMap<Object, Object> attributes = new ConcurrentHashMap<Object, Object>(4);
...
}
是一個ConcurrentHashMap。因此,它是通過KEY的hashCode去尋找物件,上述兩個例項是一樣的,事實上間接說明了它們的hashCode()返回的是一樣的值。
我們看到AttributeKey的hashCode()函式,唯一不一樣的地方就只能是name,name是String型別的,其hashCode()計算方法如下:
Open Declaration int java.lang.String.hashCode()
Returns a hash code for this string. The hash code for a String object is computed as
s[0]*31^(n-1) + s[1]*31^(n-2) + ... + s[n-1]
using int arithmetic, where s[i] is the ith character of the string, n is the length of the string, and ^ indicates exponentiation. (The hash value of the empty string is zero.)
從上述String中hashCode()的演算法我們可知,只要String的內容一樣,它們的hashCode()就是一樣的。所以,就有了兩個ProtocolCodecFilter中通過session.getAttribute(DECODER_OUT)會拿到同一物件,也就可能產生相互干擾的情況。
之於相應的解決方法,可以把相應的Filter類抓出來,如ProtocolCodecFitler:
public class MyProtocolCodecFilter extends IoFilterAdapter {
/** A logger for this class */
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyProtocolCodecFilter.class);
private static final Class<?>[] EMPTY_PARAMS = new Class[0];
private static final IoBuffer EMPTY_BUFFER = IoBuffer.wrap(new byte[0]);
private final AttributeKey ENCODER = new AttributeKey(MyProtocolCodecFilter.class, "encoder");
private final AttributeKey DECODER = new AttributeKey(MyProtocolCodecFilter.class, "decoder");
private final AttributeKey DECODER_OUT = new AttributeKey(MyProtocolCodecFilter.class, "decoderOut");
private final AttributeKey ENCODER_OUT = new AttributeKey(MyProtocolCodecFilter.class, "encoderOut");
...
...
}
呼叫的時候,由原先的
connector.getFilterChain().addLast("my-codec", new ProtocolCodecFilter(new OwspMessageFactory()));
改成
connector.getFilterChain().addLast("my-codec", new MyProtocolCodecFilter(new OwspMessageFactory()));
注:轉載請註明出處 http://blog.csdn.net/oathevil/article/details/37601391