jackson 反序列化複雜泛型物件
阿新 • • 發佈:2019-01-25
最近在使用Redis 快取資料的時候使用的spring 的aop自動從快取中去區json資料。發現方法的返回值帶有泛型時,直接簡單的呼叫使用下面的方法無法拿到正確的結果。
Method method = ((MethodSignature) pjp.getSignature()).getMethod(); Object[] args = pjp.getArgs(); //根據方法註解和引數獲取快取的key, String key = GenerateKeyUtil.getCacheKey(method, args); String cacheJson = redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(key); Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType(); return objctMapper.readValue(cacheJson,returnType);
如果method的返回型別是List<User>,上面的方法method.getReturnType() 的返回值只是Class<java.util.List>,所以反序列化的結果是ArrayList<HashMap>型別的,而並不是List<User>型別。另外,上面為了簡化程式碼沒有判斷快取是否有值,和沒有快取執行目標方法的並新增快取的程式碼。
後來看了一下jackson的程式碼註釋,使用下列方法可以通用的解析json資料為帶泛型的結果;
Method method = ((MethodSignature) pjp.getSignature()).getMethod(); Object[] args = pjp.getArgs(); //根據方法註解和引數獲取快取的key, String key = GenerateKeyUtil.getCacheKey(method, args); //獲取redis快取的值, String cacheJson = redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(key); //帶有泛型資訊 Type genericReturnType = method.getGenericReturnType(); //獲取返回類的繫結資訊 JavaType javaType = JsonUtil.getJavaType(genericReturnType); return objectMapper.readValue(cacheJson,javaType);
下面是JsonUtil.getJavaType(Type type)的程式碼
public static JavaType getJavaType(Type type) { //判斷是否帶有泛型 if (type instanceof ParameterizedType) { Type[] actualTypeArguments = ((ParameterizedType) type).getActualTypeArguments(); //獲取泛型型別 Class rowClass = (Class) ((ParameterizedType) type).getRawType(); JavaType[] javaTypes = new JavaType[actualTypeArguments.length]; for (int i = 0; i < actualTypeArguments.length; i++) { //泛型也可能帶有泛型,遞迴獲取 javaTypes[i] = getJavaType(actualTypeArguments[i]); } return TypeFactory.defaultInstance().constructParametricType(rowClass, javaTypes); } else { //簡單型別直接用該類構建JavaType Class cla = (Class) type; return TypeFactory.defaultInstance().constructParametricType(cla, new JavaType[0]); } }
上面的方法經過測試可以解析任意層數,但是是遞迴實現,搞了半天沒搞出來迴圈方式實現。
有迴圈實現的求評論個連結或則程式碼。。。
另外把TypeFactory.constructParametricType()的原始碼註釋貼下面
/**
* Factory method for constructing {@link JavaType} that
* represents a parameterized type. For example, to represent
* type <code>List<Set<Integer>></code>, you could
* call
*<pre>
* JavaType inner = TypeFactory.constructParametricType(Set.class, Set.class, Integer.class);
* return TypeFactory.constructParametricType(ArrayList.class, List.class, inner);
*</pre>
*<p>
* The reason for first two arguments to be separate is that parameterization may
* apply to a super-type. For example, if generic type was instead to be
* constructed for <code>ArrayList<Integer></code>, the usual call would be:
*<pre>
* TypeFactory.constructParametricType(ArrayList.class, List.class, Integer.class);
*</pre>
* since parameterization is applied to {@link java.util.List}.
* In most cases distinction does not matter, but there are types where it does;
* one such example is parameterization of types that implement {@link java.util.Iterator}.
*<p>
* NOTE: type modifiers are NOT called on constructed type.
*
* @param rawType Actual type-erased type
* @param parameterTypes Type parameters to apply
*
* @since 2.5 NOTE: was briefly deprecated for 2.6
*/
覺得有用點個贊。